Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Motueka i-SITE Visitor Information Centre.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Motueka i-SITE Visitor Information Centre
Valid Reviews
175 Valid Reviews
The Motueka i-SITE Visitor Information Centre experience has a total of 177 reviews. There are 175 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 175 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 68 |
|
39% |
| 9/10 | 38 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 37 |
|
21% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 9 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 6 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
85.71% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Motueka i-SITE Visitor Information Centre valid reviews is 85.71% and is based on 175 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
165 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 175 valid reviews, the experience has 165 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 165 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 59 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 38 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 37 |
|
22% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 9 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 6 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
85.39% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Motueka i-SITE Visitor Information Centre face-to-face reviews is 85.39% and is based on 165 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
87.02%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| S Weslake | 10/10 | 1064 days | 100% |
| Rebecca Martin | 10/10 | 1109 days | 96% |
| Sophie Ingram | 10/10 | 1244 days | 90% |
| C Flynn | 1/10 | 1504 days | 52% |
| Josh Lesley-Smith | 10/10 | 1525 days | 77% |
| Marc | 9/10 | 1545 days | 76% |
| Emily Noyd | 9/10 | 1782 days | 65% |
| Cayla Stanley | 10/10 | 1782 days | 65% |
| Salvador Jimenez | 10/10 | 1853 days | 62% |
| Philipp Richter | 6/10 | 1921 days | 46% |
| Simon Quass | 10/10 | 1922 days | 59% |
| Sarah Boettcher | 9/10 | 1929 days | 59% |
| Clement Oudjaovok | 8/10 | 2147 days | 45% |
| Katherine Halliday | 9/10 | 2149 days | 49% |
| Daniela Wall | 7/10 | 2149 days | 43% |
| Katherine Britten | 9/10 | 2152 days | 49% |
| Megan | 10/10 | 2153 days | 48% |
| Nina Müller | 9/10 | 2175 days | 47% |
| Maria Schober | 4/10 | 2176 days | 33% |
| Marie Schmid | 10/10 | 2181 days | 47% |
| Charles Aubry | 10/10 | 2182 days | 47% |
| Arvid Hellquist | 9/10 | 2192 days | 47% |
| Celia Nowak | 8/10 | 2193 days | 43% |
| Jiri Blecha | 8/10 | 2194 days | 43% |
| Marie Weber | 9/10 | 2194 days | 47% |
| Michal Kamradek | 7/10 | 2229 days | 39% |
| Dieter Schmees | 9/10 | 2231 days | 45% |
| Barbara | 9/10 | 2233 days | 45% |
| Mathieu Brunel | 10/10 | 2233 days | 45% |
| Thomas and Sonja | 10/10 | 2242 days | 44% |
| Jam Boggomann | 10/10 | 2246 days | 44% |
| Pauline Gibson | 10/10 | 2248 days | 44% |
| Ian Brand | 10/10 | 2249 days | 44% |
| Antoine Vernay | 8/10 | 2255 days | 41% |
| Shona MacDonald | 10/10 | 2491 days | 33% |
| Ane Didriksen | 10/10 | 2491 days | 33% |
| Iris Anette Berger | 10/10 | 2491 days | 33% |
| Claudia de Winter | 7/10 | 2496 days | 28% |
| Cecilia Anderson | 4/10 | 2496 days | 22% |
| Christina Perez | 8/10 | 2500 days | 30% |
| Paula Renton | 8/10 | 2501 days | 30% |
| Maria-Julia Frilaj | 9/10 | 2502 days | 33% |
| Simon Mehlmann | 9/10 | 2502 days | 33% |
| Carolin Siegert | 9/10 | 2502 days | 33% |
| Pavel Jarolimek | 5/10 | 2502 days | 23% |
| Patricia Erni | 8/10 | 2503 days | 30% |
| Robert Erni | 8/10 | 2503 days | 30% |
| Lilli Erni | 8/10 | 2503 days | 30% |
| Erik Nestlez | 8/10 | 2508 days | 30% |
| Wouter Vanmoz | 10/10 | 2509 days | 32% |
| Laure Cops | 9/10 | 2509 days | 32% |
| Annika Marz | 10/10 | 2517 days | 32% |
| Julian Zeissler | 8/10 | 2517 days | 29% |
| Adam | 7/10 | 2517 days | 27% |
| Petra Albrchtoval | 6/10 | 2517 days | 23% |
| Lena Hanhart | 7/10 | 2522 days | 27% |
| Drame Mahmadou | 8/10 | 2522 days | 29% |
| Joanna Mulcahy | 10/10 | 2522 days | 32% |
| Helma Druyken | 9/10 | 2523 days | 32% |
| marcel and conny | 10/10 | 2525 days | 32% |
| Helen | 10/10 | 2525 days | 32% |
| Igor | 7/10 | 2525 days | 27% |
| Ray Bygrave | 9/10 | 2526 days | 32% |
| Maria Camen Santos Lopez | 10/10 | 2526 days | 32% |
| Veeh Barrington | 8/10 | 2526 days | 29% |
| Hirsch Svenja | 10/10 | 2528 days | 31% |
| Mahr Svenja | 7/10 | 2528 days | 27% |
| Johanna Kofler | 6/10 | 2528 days | 23% |
| Kathrin Deichmann | 7/10 | 2530 days | 27% |
| Konrad Ullmann | 8/10 | 2531 days | 29% |
| Lukas Lehmeyer | 8/10 | 2531 days | 29% |
| Mark Hofmann | 9/10 | 2531 days | 31% |
| Louison Laissus | 10/10 | 2534 days | 31% |
| Ennico | 10/10 | 2537 days | 31% |
| Juliane | 7/10 | 2537 days | 27% |
| Hannah | 7/10 | 2537 days | 27% |
| Callum | 6/10 | 2537 days | 22% |
| Barbara | 10/10 | 2537 days | 31% |
| Marinette | 10/10 | 2537 days | 31% |
| Larry Majerus | 10/10 | 2538 days | 31% |
| Jan Majerus | 10/10 | 2538 days | 31% |
| Philip Donachie | 10/10 | 2541 days | 31% |
| Luisa Bach | 10/10 | 2541 days | 31% |
| Karel | 10/10 | 2541 days | 31% |
| Phillip | 8/10 | 2543 days | 28% |
| Libby | 5/10 | 2546 days | 21% |
| Colin Billington | 5/10 | 2547 days | 21% |
| Gassat | 10/10 | 2547 days | 31% |
| Janis Gallois | 8/10 | 2548 days | 28% |
| Andreas Jung | 6/10 | 2549 days | 22% |
| Francisco Pablo Miguel | 8/10 | 2550 days | 28% |
| Constanza Salas | 10/10 | 2558 days | 30% |
| Jesse Flynn | 8/10 | 2560 days | 28% |
| Andrea Hiemer | 10/10 | 2560 days | 30% |
| Bella Danaher | 9/10 | 2562 days | 30% |
| Daniel Danamer | 10/10 | 2562 days | 30% |
| Christina Habranke | 10/10 | 2565 days | 30% |
| Julia Bonisch | 10/10 | 2568 days | 30% |
| Ina Daubenbuechel | 9/10 | 2569 days | 30% |
| Nelle Dutilleur | 8/10 | 2571 days | 27% |
| Johanna Bak | 10/10 | 2572 days | 29% |
| David Esner | 10/10 | 2573 days | 29% |
| Felix | 10/10 | 2573 days | 29% |
| David Brooks | 10/10 | 2573 days | 29% |
| Camille Gagnant | 5/10 | 2574 days | 20% |
| kamil Benes | 6/10 | 2581 days | 21% |
| Johannes Markus | 6/10 | 2582 days | 21% |
| Greg Fischer | 10/10 | 2582 days | 29% |
| Harel Cliad | 10/10 | 2582 days | 29% |
| Danica Vrsljko | 7/10 | 2582 days | 25% |
| Simon Cassie | 9/10 | 2583 days | 29% |
| nimrod yaron | 10/10 | 2583 days | 29% |
| Claire Dann | 7/10 | 2584 days | 25% |
| Carina Huhmann | 8/10 | 2589 days | 26% |
| Anne Schneider | 10/10 | 2589 days | 29% |
| Hennk Hartke | 9/10 | 2590 days | 29% |
| Charles Busnel | 10/10 | 2591 days | 29% |
| Paige Galbraith | 8/10 | 2592 days | 26% |
| Bjorn Van Mulders | 9/10 | 2594 days | 28% |
| Kim Maertens | 8/10 | 2594 days | 26% |
| Eric and Nienke | 10/10 | 2615 days | 28% |
| Elly Kappert | 10/10 | 2645 days | 26% |
| Sylvia Klatt | 10/10 | 2859 days | 16% |
| Supiot Zudovic | 10/10 | 2872 days | 16% |
| Fjord | 9/10 | 2874 days | 16% |
| Sophie Spady | 10/10 | 2876 days | 16% |
| Soizic | 9/10 | 2876 days | 16% |
| Christofer Tonn | 10/10 | 2876 days | 16% |
| Ken Milligan | 8/10 | 2877 days | 14% |
| Sarah Horn | 9/10 | 2878 days | 16% |
| Yu-Ti Chu | 8/10 | 2881 days | 14% |
| Ton Martens | 10/10 | 2881 days | 15% |
| Hendrik Rother | 9/10 | 2881 days | 15% |
| Nora | 8/10 | 2883 days | 14% |
| Katey Justice | 10/10 | 2885 days | 15% |
| Douglas Walker | 8/10 | 2885 days | 14% |
| tim wettack | 10/10 | 2890 days | 15% |
| Marketa | 9/10 | 2890 days | 15% |
| Sabisch Moritz | 9/10 | 2890 days | 15% |
| Stella Thoben | 10/10 | 2892 days | 15% |
| Paul Liecke | 9/10 | 2892 days | 15% |
| Caderet | 10/10 | 2892 days | 15% |
| James Young | 10/10 | 2892 days | 15% |
| Florent Corino | 9/10 | 2894 days | 15% |
| Lea Bulle | 9/10 | 2894 days | 15% |
| Tobi | 5/10 | 2895 days | 8% |
| Ian | 8/10 | 2896 days | 13% |
| Anna Niesl | 10/10 | 2896 days | 15% |
| Janine Kohlgrueler | 9/10 | 2897 days | 15% |
| Arno Leleu | 8/10 | 2899 days | 13% |
| Alessa Ndra | 10/10 | 2900 days | 15% |
| Patrick O'Connell | 10/10 | 2900 days | 15% |
| Francois Marchar | 6/10 | 2900 days | 9% |
| Kristine and William | 5/10 | 2903 days | 8% |
| Veronica and Jordi | 10/10 | 2909 days | 14% |
| Johnny McManmon | 9/10 | 2911 days | 14% |
| Christoph Mueller | 6/10 | 2912 days | 8% |
| Nora and Edward | 8/10 | 2913 days | 12% |
| Christina Rodewald | 8/10 | 2923 days | 12% |
| Nadine and Jan | 8/10 | 2962 days | 10% |
| Henrik Steinruecken | 8/10 | 2962 days | 10% |
| Wertra | 9/10 | 2963 days | 12% |
| Aurelie Morin | 9/10 | 2971 days | 11% |
| Leticia Martin | 10/10 | 2971 days | 11% |
| Martin Thomas | 9/10 | 2972 days | 11% |
| Franz Schueler | 10/10 | 2972 days | 11% |
| F Soppelsa | 1/10 | 2973 days | 3% |
| Dirk | 4/10 | 2978 days | 5% |
| Katharina Pape | 8/10 | 2978 days | 10% |
| Abby Rushmer | 9/10 | 2979 days | 11% |
| Sasha and Sandra Bonavia | 10/10 | 2980 days | 11% |
| Dio | 8/10 | 2982 days | 9% |
| Stephan Olivier | 8/10 | 2984 days | 9% |
| Stephan Olivier | 8/10 | 2984 days | 9% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 3222 days | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Motueka i-SITE Visitor Information Centre does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
87%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.