Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Juno Hall Backpackers and Camping.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
64 Valid Reviews
The Juno Hall Backpackers and Camping experience has a total of 68 reviews. There are 64 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 64 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Juno Hall Backpackers and Camping valid reviews is 92.81% and is based on 64 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
4 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
Within the 64 valid reviews, the experience has 4 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 4 face-to-face reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Juno Hall Backpackers and Camping face-to-face reviews is 90.00% and is based on 4 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Stefan Hohmann||8/10||270 days||84.03||84%|
|Liz Wade||8/10||298 days||81.63||82%|
|James Murphy||10/10||330 days||82.74||83%|
|harre medemblik||8/10||391 days||71.99||72%|
|Dennis Rijbroek||10/10||452 days||67.63||68%|
|Mik Jennings||9/10||452 days||67.63||68%|
|Adrian and Tanya||10/10||514 days||58.14||58%|
|Tash & Laura||9/10||664 days||34.44||34%|
|Jan Z.||10/10||695 days||30.35||30%|
|M Elsten||10/10||695 days||30.35||30%|
|Xiaoming Guo||10/10||787 days||20.03||20%|
|Grizzly Girl||10/10||787 days||20.03||20%|
|Stefano Clerici||10/10||879 days||12.39||12%|
|C J B||10/10||909 days||10.48||10%|
|L + J||10/10||940 days||8.81||9%|
|Boguslaw MAKIELLO||10/10||984 days||6.95||7%|
|M A Pelton||9/10||1026 days||5.75||6%|
|UK 50-something couple||8/10||1029 days||5.41||5%|
|Alyson Reid||9/10||1043 days||5.43||5%|
|Ewan Evans||9/10||1093 days||5.0||5%|
|Lucy Watson||10/10||1120 days||4.95||5%|
|Mairead Bushe||10/10||1125 days||4.94||5%|
|Naira Prudencio||10/10||1364 days||4.47||4%|
|Mailhos Cécile||10/10||1369 days||4.46||4%|
|Caryn Grosvenor||10/10||1388 days||4.43||4%|
|Catherine Kay||8/10||1409 days||4.17||4%|
|Svetlana L||10/10||1419 days||4.37||4%|
|Rebecca Lindsey||9/10||1424 days||4.36||4%|
|Neil Warnock||10/10||1455 days||4.3||4%|
|Shelly Stanchuk||9/10||1485 days||4.24||4%|
|Becky and James||10/10||1519 days||4.17||4%|
|Mikael Torres||9/10||1579 days||4.05||4%|
|Pamela Hoffman||8/10||1672 days||3.68||4%|
|Daniel Fuell||10/10||1679 days||3.86||4%|
|John-Jozef Proczka||9/10||1760 days||3.7||4%|
|Loic Journet||8/10||1767 days||3.5||3%|
|Janneke Hekhuis||8/10||1771 days||3.49||3%|
|Max Brunner||9/10||1814 days||3.59||3%|
|Ruth P||8/10||1822 days||3.4||3%|
|Nurul Nadia Naziron||9/10||1887 days||3.45||3%|
|Lotte Spors||10/10||1975 days||3.28||3%|
|Chiara Magelli||10/10||1988 days||3.25||3%|
|Philip Mattes||9/10||2060 days||3.11||3%|
|Claude Nobs||6/10||2156 days||2.43||2%|
|Simon Mehlmann||10/10||2439 days||2.37||2%|
|Camille Gagnant||8/10||2511 days||2.12||2%|
|Amanda Neall||8/10||3550 days||0.19||0%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Juno Hall Backpackers and Camping experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 43 days. However the Juno Hall Backpackers and Camping experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Juno Hall Backpackers and Camping experience has been adjusted for 33 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com.