Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Copland Track.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
37 Valid Reviews
The Copland Track experience has a total of 37 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 37 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Copland Track valid reviews is 86.76% and is based on 37 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
30 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
Within the 37 valid reviews, the experience has 30 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 30 face-to-face reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Copland Track face-to-face reviews is 89.00% and is based on 30 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Car R||10/10||1394 days||4.41||6%|
|Rebecca Pierce||9/10||1486 days||4.23||6%|
|Kirsty Smith||10/10||1487 days||4.23||6%|
|Karine Dransart||10/10||1490 days||4.23||6%|
|Megan Jurgensmeyer||10/10||1493 days||4.22||6%|
|Regina Baum||8/10||1735 days||3.56||5%|
|Florian Baum||7/10||1735 days||3.41||5%|
|Remi Lopez||9/10||1750 days||3.72||5%|
|David Tholander||7/10||1750 days||3.38||5%|
|Yarden Oliva||9/10||1752 days||3.71||5%|
|Beau Corazon||9/10||1848 days||3.53||5%|
|Charlotte and Julien||9/10||1848 days||3.53||5%|
|Dawn Mulligan||8/10||2138 days||2.81||4%|
|Helen Olsson||10/10||2438 days||2.37||3%|
|Tina Hilbich||8/10||2444 days||2.24||3%|
|Guillaim Terrangle||8/10||2478 days||2.18||3%|
|Evyatar Karni||10/10||2524 days||2.2||3%|
|Gal Bero||10/10||2524 days||2.2||3%|
|Ariadna & Omer||10/10||2552 days||2.15||3%|
|Maria Klister||8/10||2811 days||1.56||2%|
|Katey Justice||8/10||2822 days||1.54||2%|
|Douglas Walker||8/10||2822 days||1.54||2%|
|Joshua Perry||9/10||2823 days||1.62||2%|
|Molly Ladd||10/10||2823 days||1.62||2%|
|Sabisch Moritz||9/10||2827 days||1.61||2%|
|Daniel Jezak||7/10||2837 days||1.45||2%|
|Francis Runge||10/10||2841 days||1.58||2%|
|Andreas Garbin||9/10||2905 days||1.46||2%|
|Colby Smythe||8/10||3926 days||0.0||0%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Copland Track does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org.