Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Bargain Rental Cars.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
61 Valid Reviews
The Bargain Rental Cars experience has a total of 70 reviews. There are 61 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 9 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 61 valid reviews, the experience has 3 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 61 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Bargain Rental Cars valid reviews is 79.34% and is based on 61 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Sandy Hodge||10/10||27 days||99.88||100%|
|Geoff Willmott||10/10||58 days||99.47||100%|
|Shea Malloy||9/10||88 days||98.77||99%|
|chaoli jones||10/10||150 days||96.43||97%|
|Lindsay Collins||9/10||150 days||96.43||97%|
|Sophie R.||10/10||150 days||96.43||97%|
|Constance Sun||1/10||300 days||62.59||63%|
|Stevie Reid||10/10||301 days||85.64||86%|
|Mabyn Carmichael||8/10||332 days||78.41||78%|
|Ali Millar||2/10||363 days||59.34||59%|
|Pete UK||9/10||638 days||38.09||38%|
|Ms Harris||1/10||638 days||27.81||28%|
|Terry Smith||1/10||819 days||12.46||12%|
|Qassim Kaisi||10/10||942 days||8.71||9%|
|VAINE TUKURANGI TOKI||10/10||942 days||8.71||9%|
|Kirstie & Aaron||10/10||1003 days||6.34||6%|
|Dave Watson||10/10||1031 days||5.65||6%|
|Kishore Lal||10/10||1122 days||4.95||5%|
|Kevin West||10/10||1153 days||4.89||5%|
|Jacky McLaren||9/10||1183 days||4.83||5%|
|Jason Smith||10/10||1183 days||4.83||5%|
|Chris Skeen||10/10||1306 days||4.59||5%|
|Kathryn Algar||9/10||1367 days||4.47||4%|
|Dean Godfrey||10/10||1367 days||4.47||4%|
|Ehds Reyes||9/10||1395 days||4.41||4%|
|Martin White||9/10||1426 days||4.35||4%|
|Niyaz Noor||1/10||1426 days||3.18||3%|
|Alison Stewart||6/10||1426 days||3.61||4%|
|Graeme Worsley||10/10||1426 days||4.35||4%|
|Jun c||10/10||1457 days||4.29||4%|
|Franceska Banga||1/10||1701 days||2.78||3%|
|mathew sullivan||1/10||2188 days||2.09||2%|
|Sue Cockrell||10/10||2523 days||2.21||2%|
|Danlin Yang||8/10||4282 days||0.0||0%|
|Anne Mainwaring||8/10||4678 days||0.0||0%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Bargain Rental Cars experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 43 days. However the Bargain Rental Cars experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Bargain Rental Cars experience has been adjusted for 17 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org.