Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Skydive Abel Tasman.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
105 Valid Reviews
The Skydive Abel Tasman experience has a total of 111 reviews. There are 105 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 6 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 105 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Skydive Abel Tasman valid reviews is 94.10% and is based on 105 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
88 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
Within the 105 valid reviews, the experience has 88 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 88 face-to-face reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Skydive Abel Tasman face-to-face reviews is 92.95% and is based on 88 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|D Hahn||9/10||1345 days||4.51||100%|
|Moe Bouchard||9/10||1360 days||4.48||99%|
|Annika Jung||9/10||1377 days||4.45||99%|
|Joel and Flora Holzer||9/10||1382 days||4.44||98%|
|Lianne Ijlst||9/10||1383 days||4.44||98%|
|Max Miehle||8/10||1418 days||4.15||92%|
|Simeon Manz||8/10||1481 days||4.03||89%|
|Chantal Compagner||9/10||1706 days||3.8||84%|
|Matthew Palmer||10/10||1723 days||3.77||84%|
|Ruben Toorwe||8/10||1739 days||3.55||79%|
|Melissa Loose||9/10||1751 days||3.72||82%|
|Amy Neubler||10/10||1753 days||3.71||82%|
|Emil Black Christian||10/10||1757 days||3.7||82%|
|Pernilla Therkildsen||10/10||1757 days||3.7||82%|
|John Hamilton||6/10||1766 days||3.06||68%|
|Thorbeu Scholz||10/10||1778 days||3.66||81%|
|Maxim Reim||8/10||1785 days||3.47||77%|
|Lisa Huber||8/10||1785 days||3.47||77%|
|Mak Walther||9/10||2088 days||3.06||68%|
|Miriam Burchartz||10/10||2088 days||3.06||68%|
|Katharina Block||10/10||2089 days||3.05||68%|
|Annika Fletemeyer||10/10||2089 days||3.05||68%|
|Maria Schober||9/10||2115 days||3.0||67%|
|Ane Didriksen||9/10||2430 days||2.39||53%|
|Christine Helleiner||9/10||2465 days||2.32||51%|
|Julia Kallenbach||10/10||2509 days||2.23||50%|
|Anne Schneider||10/10||2528 days||2.2||49%|
|Omri Ifrsh||10/10||2804 days||1.66||37%|
|Linda Mak||10/10||2829 days||1.61||36%|
|Paul Liecke||9/10||2831 days||1.6||36%|
|Stella Thoben||8/10||2831 days||1.52||34%|
|Johannes Knoepfle||9/10||2863 days||1.54||34%|
|Anja and Katharina||9/10||2928 days||1.41||31%|
|Fam von Hattem||9/10||2931 days||1.41||31%|
|Sabrina Germany||9/10||3189 days||0.9||20%|
|John Heal||9/10||3299 days||0.69||15%|
|Nick Secker||9/10||3578 days||0.14||3%|
|Leslie Aldridge||10/10||3581 days||0.14||3%|
|Calvin Parsons||9/10||3588 days||0.12||3%|
|Ashley Arnold||10/10||3929 days||0.0||0%|
|Gary Ebrig||10/10||3938 days||0.0||0%|
|Amanda Hoff||10/10||3953 days||0.0||0%|
|Vicki Cashmore||10/10||4027 days||0.0||0%|
|Eliott Family||10/10||4337 days||0.0||0%|
|Chris Hertz||10/10||4377 days||0.0||0%|
|George Burgas||8/10||4483 days||0.0||0%|
|Sharon Curly||8/10||4491 days||0.0||0%|
|Christina Endicott||10/10||4554 days||0.0||0%|
|Brian Endicott||10/10||4554 days||0.0||0%|
|Georgina Mulligan||10/10||4579 days||0.0||0%|
|Jason Page||9/10||4639 days||0.0||0%|
|Renske Tehurne||8/10||4650 days||0.0||0%|
|Andre Obineche||10/10||4699 days||0.0||0%|
|Sandra Gustafson||10/10||4701 days||0.0||0%|
|Mette de Graap||9/10||4701 days||0.0||0%|
|lawrence Walker||9/10||4733 days||0.0||0%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Skydive Abel Tasman experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 43 days. However the Skydive Abel Tasman experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Skydive Abel Tasman experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org.