Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Christchurch Tramway.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
42 Valid Reviews
The Christchurch Tramway experience has a total of 42 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 42 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Christchurch Tramway valid reviews is 80.48% and is based on 42 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
36 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
Within the 42 valid reviews, the experience has 36 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 36 face-to-face reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Christchurch Tramway face-to-face reviews is 78.89% and is based on 36 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Ara Moore-Tuwhangai||10/10||2378 days||100%|
|Sue Robertson||10/10||3213 days||32%|
|Jim Addicott||10/10||3213 days||32%|
|Derek Puplett||8/10||3570 days||2%|
|Frank Lehe||9/10||3579 days||2%|
|David Heads||2/10||3581 days||0%|
|Brigitta Reil||9/10||3915 days||38%|
|Marcus Kippner||5/10||3922 days||30%|
|Coby Aalbrecht||6/10||3958 days||31%|
|W David R Thomas||9/10||3964 days||38%|
|John J||8/10||3973 days||36%|
|Stevens Frans||2/10||3976 days||27%|
|Greg Kennedy||10/10||3978 days||38%|
|Heino keyssler||10/10||3979 days||38%|
|X Neils||5/10||4043 days||30%|
|Mark Coffey||9/10||4265 days||38%|
|Debbie Mossman||9/10||4340 days||38%|
|Amy Shields||9/10||4476 days||38%|
|Paul Weston||8/10||4658 days||36%|
|David Buckley||10/10||4665 days||38%|
|Jurgen Westphal||9/10||4665 days||38%|
|Roger & Margaret||8/10||4666 days||36%|
|Jim Curley||10/10||4677 days||38%|
|Wayne Best||4/10||4701 days||29%|
|Hanna Tidebrant||8/10||4832 days||36%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Christchurch Tramway experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Christchurch Tramway experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Christchurch Tramway experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com.